I don't mind the dual review at all, especially when the games reviewed are filler games, so to speak. I think my main issue with this one is this -Would be interested on some feedback on this one guys. Main issues with this were:
* Didn't really feel like there could be a lot of content to write about each game individually, so a combined feature felt more appropriate.
* But with that being said, the CMS can't really support a dual-review format like this in terms of providing scores and the big store link under-banners etc...
So really, while these aren't 'official' reviews, you could treat them as such as Mark did he would have scored RBC 4/5 and MC 3/5, but I'd have to write that in manually (not sure if Metacritic would even pick that up).
I chose not to in this instance as I did ask for a feature over actual reviews, but would be interested in knowing what you guys thought. These types of articles are easier to present over on Wargamer as they don't use scores anymore.
Users browsing this forum: MSN [Bot] and 3 guests